Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content Volume 13 Issue 2 - February 2020

Role of ultrasonography in acute abdominal conditions

 

P Suresh

 

Associate Professor, Department of Radio Diagnosis, The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Yadavanahalli, Attibele Hobli, Anekal, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.

Email: drpsuresh11@yahoo.com

 

Abstract               Many patients come to hospitals with acute abdominal conditions. These abdominal emergencies can actually range from simple gastritis to life threatening causes like intestinal obstruction and perforation of a hollow abdominal organ. Hence in such conditions the investigation and diagnosis should be accurate. This study puts a real effort to find the role of Ultrasonography in patients with acute abdominal conditions.

Key Words: USG, Abdomen, Acute, Role.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Acute abdomen is a condition in which there is a sudden onset of abdominal pain and the patient reveals the signs and symptoms that has something to do with the viscera of the abdomen. It is a medical emergency because such patients in majority of cases are frightened and apprehensive. But as a physician we should understand the fact that only about 20 to 30 percent of such cases that present to us actually need a surgical intervention immediately. So the best alternative is to have a radiological opinion. Although Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are options, the common man rarely has that kind of financial freedom to undergo these investigations. So the best alternative investigation is Ultrasonography (USG) which is cost effective. These emergencies can actually range from simple gastritis to life threatening causes like intestinal obstruction, perforation and rupture of a hollow abdominal organ like the stomach1,2. So the investigation and diagnosis should be spot on. The region of the abdomen involved should also give the information pertaining to what should be the mode of investigation. It’s popularly believed that for the right upper quadrant of the abdomen ultrasonography is the preferred choice and in the right and left lower quadrants CT is the preferred choice3. However it should also be understood that clinical diagnosis, laboratory investigations and the imaging diagnosis together will be more accurate in majority of the cases rather than believing and burdening on the imaging diagnosis alone4. CT and MRI can be accurate but USG is still the most sought after imaging technique because of its basic simple nature and also cost effectiveness particularly in a country like ours4,5,6. This study puts a real effort to find the role of USG in patients presenting with acute abdominal conditions.

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To study the role of Ultrasonography in patients presenting with acute abdominal conditions.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was done in the Department of Radiodiagnosis at The Oxford Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore.

The study period was from November 2017 to October 2019.

Five hundred and forty patients who presented with acute abdominal conditions from different clinical departments of our hospital were chosen for this study.

Ultrasonography was done for all the patients in our department using GE Machines (Logiq P3, Logiq P5 and Voluson P8). Low frequency curved array and high frequency linear array transducers were used for ultrasonography. The ultrasound diagnosis was made and then the patients were followed up to find out the exact diagnosis. The final tally was made to find the role of ultrasonography in finding out the exact diagnosis.

Inclusion Criteria:

Only patients presenting with acute abdominal conditions.

Exclusion criteria:

Patients on steroid therapy and immunosuppresive drugs.

Patients who have already been diagnosed and have come with relapse.

RESULTS

Table 1: Age Distribution

Age in years

No. of cases

1-20

106

21-40

165

41- 60

123

> 60

146

Total

540

 

Table 2: Sex Distribution

Sex

Number of cases

Percentage

Male

300

56

Female

240

44

Total

540

100

 

Table 3: USG Diagnosis (Based upon region)

Region (Pain)

Diagnosis (USG)

Could Not Be Diagnosed by USG

Right upper quadrant

Biliary: Cholecystitis Cholelithiasis

Hepatic: Abscess Hepatitis Mass

Oesophagitis

Gastritis

Cholangitis

Epigastric

Gastric: Peptic ulcer

Biliary: Cholecystitis

Cholelithiasis

Pancreatic: Mass, Pancreatitis

Gastritis

Cholangitis

Oesophagitis

Left upper quadrant

Gastric: Peptic ulcer

Pancreatic: Mass

Esophagitis

Gastritis

Mesenteric ischemia

 

Periumbilical Region

Colonic: Early appendicitis

Gastric: Peptic ulcer

Small bowel: Mass or obstruction

 

Gastritis

Right lower quadrant

Colonic: Appendicitis
Gynecologic: Ectopic pregnancy PID
Renal: Nephrolithiasis

Pyelonephritis

 

Colitis, IBD, IBS, Torsion

 

 

Suprapubic

Colonic: Appendicitis
Gynecologic: Ectopic pregnancy, Torsion

Renal: Nephrolithiasis

IBD

IBS

Left lower quadrant

Colonic: colitis

Gynecologic: ectopic pregnancy PID
Renal: nephrolithiasis

Pyelonephritis

1

     Image 1: Appendicitis         Image 2: Cholelithiasis with Cholecystitis Image 3: Pelvic Inflammatory Disease  Image 4: Ectopic Pregnancy

As the interpretation is concerned USG is highly specific in diagnosing the disease in the right upper and epigastric quadrants. But it is not specific in other quadrants.

 

Table 4: Percentage and Significance

Procedure

Percentage

Sensitivity

Specificity

USG

0.5495

87.2%

37.1%

 

USG

Actual Diagnosis

Total

 

Pathology

No Pathology

 

Pathology

310

41

351

No Pathology

182

07

189

Total

492

48

540

The sensitivity was 87.2%; The specificity was 37.1%; Positive predictive value was 96.8%; Negative predictive value was 11.7%

 

DISCUSSION

The most common causes of acute abdomen depends upon the age of the patient. Causes of abdominal pain according to age of the patient. 2

 

Birth to 1 year

1st Decade

2nd Decade

Adults

 

 

 

 

Medical

Infantile colic

Gastroenteritis

Gastroenteritis Constipation

Gastroenteritis Constipation

Gastroenteritis

Lower Lobe Pneumonia

Abdominal Tuberculosis

Lower Lobe Pneumonia

Constipation

Constipation

Bowel disease

Pharyngitis

Urinary Tract Infection

Urinary Tract Infection

Functional Pain

Dysmenorrhea

Sickle Cell Crisis

Lower Lobe Pneumonia

Mittelschmerz

Henoch-Schonlein purpura

Pharyngitis

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Mesenteric Lymphadenitis

Urinary Tract Infection

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Pneumonia

Sickle Cell Crisis

Henoch-Schonlein purpura

Mesenteric Lymphadenitis.

Surgical

Intussusception

Appendicitis

Appendicitis

Appendicitis

Volvulus/malrotations

Intussusception

Cholecystitis

Ectopic Pregnancy

Incarcerated Hernias

Volvulus

Testicular Torsion

Testicular Torsion

Hirschsprung’s disease

Trauma

Trauma

Ovarian Torsion

Necrotizing Enterocolitis

 

USG diagnosis is very useful as it is very cost effective. It can also be used for diagnoses of acute abdominal conditions in pregnant females as it does not have ionising radiation. In this study it was found to be useful. It had highly sensitivity as well. Although a bit low on the specificity, it becomes a very important tool for initial diagnosis. The most common conditions that have to be diagnosed depends upon the age of the patient and the specific quadrant of the abdomen involved. The most commonly involved quadrants are:

 

Region (Pain)

Diagnosis (USG)

Right upper quadrant

Biliary: cholecystitis Cholelithiasis

Hepatic: abscess Hepatitis Mass

Oesophagiti Gastritis

Cholangitis

 

Epigastric

Gastric: peptic ulcer

Biliary: cholecystitis Cholelithiasis

Pancreatic: mass Pancreatitis Gastritis Cholangitis Oesophagitis

 

Left upper quadrant

Gastric: peptic ulcer
Pancreatic: mass
Esophagitis Gastritis mesenteric ischemia

 

Periumbilical

Colonic: early appendicitis
Gastric: peptic ulcer

small-bowel mass or obstruction Esophagitis Gastritis

Right lower quadrant

Colonic: appendicitis
Gynecologic: ectopic pregnancy PID

Renal: nephrolithiasis Pyelonephritis Colitis IBD IBS Torsion Pyelonephritis

 

Suprapubic

Colonic: appendicitis
Gynecologic: ectopic pregnancy
Renal: nephrolithiasis
Torsion IBD IBS

Left lower quadrant

Colonic: colitis
Gynecologic: ectopic pregnancy PID
Renal: nephrolithiasis
Pyelonephritis

 


The most important aspect that has to be remembered is the fact that the experience of the radiologist also should be considered. This single criterion can make a lot of difference. The most common technique used to examine patients by majority of the radiologists with acute abdominal pain is the graded-compression procedure 7. In this technique the radiologist can move the interposing fat and bowel can be displaced or compressed by means of gradual compression to show underlying structures. Furthermore, if the bowel cannot be compressed, the noncompressibility itself is an indication of pathology 4,7. Some time the radiologists use the dynamic examination in evaluation of bowel hernias, mesentery, and omentum through the Valsalva manoeuvre. This manoeuvre may reveal an intermittent hernia, may show the contiguity of a mass with the intraperitoneal space, allowing better depiction of the hernia sac or abdominal wall defect and also showing reducibility 8. Curved and linear transducers are most commonly used, with frequencies depending on the application and the patient’s stature.9,10. Although MRI and CT are options, the common man rarely has that kind of financial freedom to undergo these procedures. So the best alternative investigation is Ultrasonography.

 

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography is a very useful, cost effective and sensitive imaging modality in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. The fact that the experience of the radiologist doing the ultrasound scan should be considered is very important for diagnosis of acute abdominal conditions. Hence competent radiologists can diagnose many diseases by ultrasonography in patients presenting with acute abdominal conditions.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Cartwright SL, Knudson MP. Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2008;5:971–8. Review.
  2. Scaglione M. Emergency Radiology of the Abdomen. 1. Springer Heidelberg. New York: Dordrecht London; 2012. Imaging Features and Differential Diagnosis for a Timely Management Approach; pp. 133–164.
  3. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, Grant TH, Greene FL, Jones B, Katz DS, Lalani T, Miller FH, Small WC, Spottswood S, Sudakoff GS, Tulchinsky M, Warshauer DM, Yee J, Coley BD. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain--suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;5:749–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.010. Review.
  4. Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;5:31–46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531090302. Review.
  5. Reginelli A, Mandato Y, Solazzo A, Berritto D, Iacobellis F, Grassi R. Errors in the radiological evaluation of the alimentary tract: part II. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;5(4):308–17. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2012.01.016.
  6. Mandato Y, Reginelli A, Galasso R, Iacobellis F, Berritto D, Cappabianca S. Errors in the radiological evaluation of the alimentary tract: part I. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;5(4):300–7. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2012.01.011.
  7. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, de Vries BC, van der Werf SD, Dörr JP, Blok RA. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987;5:666–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709103171103
  8. Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA, Morag Y, Girish G, Dong Q, Al-Hawary M, Franz MG. Characteristic locations of inguinal region and anterior abdominal wall hernias: sonographic appearances and identification of clinical pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;5:1356–64. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0638.
  9. Laméris W, van Randen A, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2008;5:2498–511. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1018-6.
  10. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008;5:97–106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071652.

Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Radiology(Print ISSN: 2579-0927) (Online ISSN: 2636 - 4689) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.